ECO 200 810 Principles of
Macroeconomics Homework #5, due 4/20 Answer Key
Consider the equation of exchange. Suppose the economy is characterized
by
M = $4 trillion V = 2 P = 100
What is the value of real output (Q)?
MV = PQ $4 trillion x 2 = 100 x Q Q = $ .08 trillion or $80 billion, an
increase 10%
Suppose the Fed increases the money supply by 10%, and velocity is
stable.
If the price level remains constant, what will happen to real output?
$4.4 trillion x 2 = 100 x Q Q = $.088 trillion or $88 billion, an increase
of 10%
If instead real output is fixed at it's full employment level, what
will happen when M increases by 10%?
$4.4 trillion x 2 = P x $.08 trillion P = 110, an increase of 10%
By how much would V have to fall to offset the increase in M?
$4.4 trillion x V = $8 trillion V = 1.8, or a decrease of about 10%
Explain why traditional fiscal or
monetary policies are not good options in dealing with stagflation. Be
sure to consider the impact on aggregate demand and/or aggregate supply
in your answer.
Traditional monetary and fiscal policies only
shift the aggregate demand curve. Shifting AD left will help inflation
but make unemployment worse. Shifting AD right will help unemployment
in some cases but it will make inflation worse. Thus, shifiting AD
cannot solve both inflation and unemployment problems simultaneously.
This tradeoff is demonstrated with the Phillips curve.
Contrast the views of Keynesians vs.
Supply-siders on tax cuts.
Keynesians see any tax cut expanding output
by increasing disposable income and thus spending, shifting AD to the right.
Supply-siders want specific types of tax cuts in order to boost incentives
to work and produce, shifting AS to the right and expanding output.
Economists and environmentalists alike
predicted a halt to economic growth long before the year 2000 due to a
combination of overpopulation and resource exhaustion. How do markets
provide incentives that postpone resource exhaustion?
When resources become scarce, their prices
rise. This price is the signal that gives consumers the incentive
to conserve, and firms the incentive to discover cheaper (and thus more
plentiful) substitutes and increase efficiency in the use of resources.