-
Consider the following model:
C = 350 + .75Y
G = 170
I = 140
X-IM = -10
At what level of Y is there no saving? (hint: saving is zero when C=Y)
savings = 0 when C=Y = 350 + .75Y
.25Y = 350
Y = 1400
Solve for equilibrium AE.
AE=Y = C+I+G+X-IM = 350+.75Y + 170 + 140 -
10 = 650 + .75Y
Y = 650 + .75Y
.25Y = 650
Y = 2600
What happens to equilibrium expenditure if I falls to 100?
-
I falls from 140 to 100--a decrease of 40
-
change in equilibrium expenditure = initial change
in spending x multiplier
-
multiplier = 1/(1-MPC) = 1/(1-.75) = 1/.25 = 4
-
so,
change in equilibrium expenditure = 40 x 4
= 160
equilibrium expenditures falls by 160 (to
2440)
What happens to equilibrium expenditure if G rises to 200?
G rises from 170 to 200--an increase of 30
change in equilibrium expenditure = 30 x 4
= 120
equilibrium expenditure rises by 120 (to 2720)
Suppose we wish to increase equilibrium AE to 3000 (from the original
equilibrium AE) How much do we need to increase G?
original AE equilibrium = 2600 so we want
an increase of 400
so we want to solve,
400 = change in G x multiplier = change in
G x 4
so
change in G = 400/4 = 100
-
Consider the following model:
C = 1000 + .8(Y-T)
G = 2100
I = 1600
T = 2000
X-IM = 0
Solve for equilibrium AE. (Hint: do not forget to put taxes (T) is the
consumption function!)
AE = Y = C+I+G+X-IM = 1000 + .8(Y- 2000) +
2100 +1600 = 4700 + .8(Y - 2000)
Y = 4700 + .8(Y-2000)
Y = 4700 +.8Y - .8(2000) = 4700 + .8Y - 1600
= 3100 + .8Y
.2Y = 3100
Y = 15,500
Suppose Congress and the President want to balance the budget. What
happens to equilibrium if
(a) We balance the budget by increasing taxes so that T=G?
T = 2000 and G = 2100, so we are talking about
the effect of a tax increase of 100 on equilibrium
the tax multiplier = MPC/(1-MPC) = .8/(1-.8)
= 4
so, the total impact of a 100 tax increase
is
4 x 100 = 400
so equilibrium will decrease by 400 if taxes
rise to 2100
(b) We balance the budget by decreasing government purchases so
that G=T?
T = 2000 and G = 2100, so we are talking about
the effect of a decrease in G of 100 on equilibrium
the multiplier = 1/(1-MPC) = 1/(1-.8) = 5
so , the total impact of a 100 decrease in
G is
5 x 100 = 500
so equilibrium will decrease by 500 if G falls
to 2000
-
Suppose that when income increases by $1000, we expect consumers to increase
their spending by $900. Given that, what is the impact of a $200 tax cut
on equilibrium AE? (hint: what does the first sentence imply about the
MPC?)
-
First, if C changes by 900 when Y changes by 1000,
then the MPC = 900/1000 = .9
-
(recall the MPC is the change in consumption relative
to a change in income)
-
Now that we know the MPC, we can calculater the
tax mulitplier:
.9/(1-.9) = 9
-
so the impact of a tax cut = 9 x 200 = 1800
-
equilibrium AE will rise by 1800 if taxes fall
by 200
-
Given that C = 1000 + 0.60Y, if the level of income is $1000, what is the
the level of saving? (hint: Y=C+S)
-
First, if Y = $1000, then C = 1000 + .6(1000)
= 1600
-
using Y = C + S, then 1000 = 1600 + S
-
so S = -600, or they are dissaving 600
-
Given a consumption function of C=25 + 0.75Y, at what level of incomes
does C=100?
100 = 25 + .75Y
.75Y = 75
Y = 100
-
Given that autonomous consumption equals $1000, disposable income equals
$20,000, and the MPC equals 0.90, what are the levels of consumption and
saving?
-
first, let's put together the consumption function:
C = a + bY. The MPC = b = .9 and autonomous consumption = a = 1000
so
-
so if Y = 20,000
C = 1000 + .9(20,000) = 19000
S = Y-C = 20000 - 19000 = 1000