PHL314 Existentialism
Professor: Craig DeLancey
Office: Piez Hall 225
Email: delancey@oswego.edu
Past Assignments
January 27 a request and a homework.
Start reading part I of Nietzsche's Genealogy of
Morals. Skip Nietzsche's introduction; and the editor's
introduction is optional.
January 29
Finish reading part I of Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals.
February 3
Finish reading part II of Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals.
February 5
Finish reading part III of Nietzsche's Genealogy of
Morals. Short assignment! Write a 1 to 2 page typed
summary (double spaced, courier font, 1 inch margins)
summarizing your understanding of what Nietzsche's primary
claims are in part III of the Genealogy of Morals.
Try to answer primately the questions: What is ascetism? How
does Nietzsche believe it came about? What is the last man?
And what does he mean by the last sentence of Part III? (I'm
looking here for proof you struggled a bit with the text.)
February 8
Read the Husserl handout and also section 7 part c of Being
and Time (pages 58-63).
February 10
Read B&T pages 1-40 (sections 1-5). Don't worry if it is
confusing -- we'll clarify as we work on it, but it is useful
to attempt it on your own. Recommended are Polt chapters 1
and 2 (pages 1 - 21).
February 12:
Read B&T sections 9, 10, 11 (pages 65-77).
February 15
Read B&T sections 12 and 13 (chapter II, pages 78-90).
February 17
Read B&T sections 14 and 15.
February 19
Read B&T sections 16, 17, and 18 (you should thus have read
up to page 122 now).
A simple assignment, due at the beginning of class.
This should only take a paragraph or two. It can be typed
or handwritten. Four tasks: (1) Write at least one
existentiell fact about yourself, and also (2) one
existential fact about yourself. Also: (3) name one thing
that is typically ready-to-hand for you, and describe when
it is ready-to-hand (I mean, under what kinds of activities
or conditions)? And (4) name one thing that is
present-at-hand for you and describe when (that is, during
which kind of activity) it is present-at-hand. Please apply
the honor system and come up with your own example, working
on your own. Don't just copy an example from Dreyfus or
Polt or -- god forbid -- Wikipedia.
I recommend that you read B&T sections 19 through 24 (pages
122-148), but we will unfortunately not be able to make the
time to discuss them.
February 22
Read B&T chapter IV section 27.
Recommended is all of B&T chapter IV.
February 24
Read sections 29, 31, and 32.
But recommended is all of chapter 5.
Homework (this concerns the discussion in chapter 4 on the
ready-to-hand). Write a brief description of how, in your
own life, (1) something ready-to-hand became present-at-hand
because of conspicuousness; (2) something ready-to-hand
became present-at-hand because of obstinacy; (3) something
ready-to-hand became present- at-hand because of
obtrusiveness. This will likely just take you a paragraph or
two. You may also explain how the totality of the
towards-which of equipment became present to you in each
case. See pages 102-103 for a reminder.
February 26
Read from B&T chapter V, sections 35 through 38.
1 March
Read B&T chapter VI, sections 40 and 41.
3 March
Read B&T Division II, sections 45, 50.
Homework! Write a brief description of an instance of idle
talk in your own life; and of curiosity (in Heidegger's sense
of inauthentic greed for the new) in your own life. How do
they arise from a they-self?
5 March
Read B&T Division II, sections 51-53.
8 March
Read B&T Division II, sections 54-57, 60, 62.
10 March
Exam 1. Heidegger and Nietzsche. Topics will include but not
be limited to (and so you'll be expected to be able explain
accurately but to an intelligent roommate):
- Nietzsche's history of Christian morality
- Nietzsche's concept of Resentment
- The Ubermensch
- Dasein
- World, Being-in-the-world
- Ready-to-hand
- Present-at-hand
- Towards-which and for-the-sake-of-which
- Being-with
- Das Mann
- the They-self
- Attunement ("State-of-mind")
- Idle talk, curiosity, ambiguity
- Angst ("anxiety")
- Resoluteness
- What it means that Dasein must die alone
- Authentic and inauthentic ways of being for Dasein
22 March
Read "Existentialism is a Humanism," available at:
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sartre/works/exist/sartre.htm.
This is our first non-technical reading, so you should be
able to understand it pretty well before we sit down to discuss
it. While reading, ask yourself:
- What are the criticisms that Sartre sets out to answer?
- What does Sartre really suspect causes
critics to dislike existentialism?
- What are the two kinds of existentialists,
according to Sartre?
- What does Sartre say all existentialists
have in common? That is, how does he define
existentialism?
- How does Sartre interpret and explain
"anguish" (which is a common translation for
angst and anxiety), "abandonment" and "despair"
?
- Why can existentialism allow a moral
judgment?
- What does he mean when he says that
existentialism is a humanism? That is, what
sense of "humanisim" is he ruling out, and what
sense is he intending?
We discussed the Milgram experiment. Some footage of the original
is buried in a lot of youtube noise, but
here's some of it.
26 March
Read our selection from Being and Nothingness.
29, 31 March
Read Sartre's No Exit.
Come ready to describe the play, and to offer both a
Sartrean and a general existentialist interpretation of
it. Here are some questions to think about (and wouldn't
they make great pop-quiz question?):
- Where are Garcin, Inez, Estelle? Or: where
do they think they are?
- Does it mean something that they cannot
find a mirror (a "glass")?
- Does anything distinguish the three
characters' interaction in the room that is a
necessary feature of the room? That is, are
they acting the way they are because of some
outside influence?
- What do you think of Garcin's plan to help
each other?
- Does Garcin's motive in fleeing the war
matter?
- What matters to Estelle? In herself and in
others?
- What should we think of Garcin's goal: to
convince another he is not a coward, that he is
good?
- Does it matter that the room is in Second
Empire style?
5 April
We should take a day to discuss free will, since it keeps
coming up.
5 April
Read Sartre's The Flies. (You really should read
Aeschylus's trilogy of plays, The Oresteia, if you
have not done so in the past. You can get a copy of
Agamemnon, The Libation Bearers, and The
Eumenides just about anywhere, and you can't really
claim to be educated without having read these.)
April 12
Beckett Waiting for Godot, Act I, in class.
April 14
Beckett Waiting for Godot, Act II, in class.
April 16
Discussion of Beckett; perhaps a scene from Happy Days.
April 19
Background on Camus. Discussion of "The Myth of
Sisyphus." A few copies are floating around on the web; e.g.,
here.
April 21
No class. Quest.
Soon we're going to read Camus's The Plague. There is a
decent reading available also. For example, at: audible.
Obviously it's not cheaper than the paperback....
April 23
The Plague, part I (pages 1-64). Questions to ask yourself while
reading include:
- What is Oran like? Where is it? On what sea or ocean?
- What does Rieux do for a living?
- What is the meaning, or what is revealed, by Rieux's first
exchange with the journalist Rambert?
- What is the first sign of plague?
- What is the meaning of the old man with the cats that Tarrou
writes about in his journal? (I mean: the
old man who spits on the cats?)
- Why are the city leaders reluctant to declare a plague?
What do you think is the significance of them trying to ascribe
to Rieux a "view" and of Rieux resisting this?
April 26
Some of you were giving Quest talks and were a bit swamped by it,
so I've given you some extra time on the paper. A ~5 page paper
due, on one of the following questions:
- What, if any, are the similarities and differences between
Sartre's Bad Faith and Heidegger's Authenticity?
- Sartre says that Heidegger is, like him, an atheist. Is this
right? What reasons are there to think it is right?
- How do the condition and the choices of the characters in
No Exit exemplify choices and difficulties that Sartre
describes in his existentialism?
- How do the condition and the choices of the characters in
The Flies exemplify choices and difficulties that Sartre
describes in his existentialism?
- Orestes tells Zeus that it doesn't matter if Zeus created
the universe. Would Sartre's existentialism remain the same
if a god existed? Focus on one specific aspect of his existentialism
-- for example, the idea that values are created by choice.
- How do Heidegger and Sartre balance their notions of
facticity with the claim that we are free?
- What, if any, similarities are there between Beckett's
work and existentialism? Where do they differ? (A good thing
to consider is the notion of authenticity....)
I would consider a one-act play or short fiction in lieu of the
paper; you would have to discuss it with me. In such a case the
due date could be later. Please follow my paper
format guidelines.
April 26
The Plague, part II (pages 65-164). While reading, ask yourself:
- What is the meaning of Paneloux's sermon? What does it
mean the plague really is?
- What is Rambert's primary goal? Contrast Rambert with
Grand -- what are their relative motivations? What are they
spending all their (free) time doing?
- What is Tarrou's proposal to Rieux? Does it mean something
that Tarrou proposes it (as opposed to, say, a government program)?
- What is Rieux's view on God and the plague?
April 28
The Plague, parts III and IV (pages 165-266). While reading,
ask yourself and be prepared to answer questions about:
- How do they now have burials during the plague?
- Why does Camus spend such detail upon the death of Othon's
son?
- What is Paneloux's response to the child's death?
- Why do you think that people find superstition comforting?
- Why is Cottard flourishing during the plague?
- What does Rambert do when he gets a chance to escape? Why?
Similarly, what does Othon do when he can leave the stadium?
Why?
- What does Grand do when facing death?
30 April
The Plague, part V (pages 267-308). While reading, ask yourself:
- What did Tarrou mean when he said he has plague?
- Why does Tarrou say it's harder to be a man than a saint?
- What happens to Rieux's wife? What happens to Tarrou?
- The novel ends with celebration. Why? To what does Camus
mean to draw our attention?