PHL313 Philosophy of Language
Professor: Craig DeLancey
Office: CC217
Email: delancey@oswego.edu



Current Assignments
14 May: final exam or paper.

EXAM: . 10:30 a.m. -- 12:30 p.m. Topics and kinds of questions include perhaps something from the midterm; but mostly some multiple choice questions and some short answer questions concerning such issues as:
  • Describe the truth-based theory of meaning. What is the modal logic extenion of this theory? What problem is that extension meant to solve?
  • Describe the use-theory of meaning.
  • Contrast the use and truth theories of meaning. What's a benefit and difficulty with each?
  • What are performative utterances? What are some examples of performative utterances?
  • Why might performative utterances pose a problem for the truth based theory of meaning?
  • What is Davidson's theory of metaphor?
  • What is the paradox regarding rule-following that Kripke claims to find in Wittgenstein's book Philosophical Investigations? Explain the paradox carefully, and use an example.
  • What is the "Sapir-Whorf" hypothesis? How does Whorf suggest that differences between Hopi and SAE shape differences in how the two cultural groups conceive of the world?
  • What is the "indeterminancy of reference" that Quine claims exists?
PAPER If you are doing a paper, you must tell me that you are before the final. You can change your mind and take the final, but that too I'd like to be warned about. The final paper must be 5 or more typed pages, 1 inch margin, 12 pt font. Write on one of the following topics; let me know what you're writing on; and if you want to pursue another topic clear it with me first. Use my paper format recommendations available here. Papers are due in my office by 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday 14 May. Topics:
  • The Liar is the sentence, "This sentence is false." Why is this sentence a problem for the truth-based theory of meaning? In your answer, explain Davidson's version of the theory, with the Tarski-biconditionals; show how one is (in principle) hoping to account of the meaning of normal sentences (like, "the cat is on the mat"); and use this to explain why The Liar is a problem. Evaluate Davidson's answer, if you can. Is The Liar an insurmountable problem, or not?
  • Defend a Truth-based meaning theory account of a bit of performative language, such as, "close the window!" What kind of declarative sentence might it (implicitly) be dependent upon? How might it best be related to it? This is a task in starting a defense of a truth-based theory of meaning as a theory of the meaning of all utterances, not just declarative sentences.
  • Compare and contrast the Davidsonian causal theory of metaphor with the Martinich theory. Pick a particular metaphor as your working example. Which is the better theory? Why?
  • How is the Kripkenstein paradox related to Wittgenstein's claim that there cannot be a private language? Explain carefully the Kripkenstein paradox, and then show how it is evidence for, or perhaps even entails, the claim that there cannot be a private language. If we solve the Kripkenstein paradox, do we then show that there could be a private language?





Tentative assignments