Home
Assessment
First year advisement
Math Methods
Supervision
Technology
Instructor
Abstracts
Performance Task Projects
Other Links
Foundations
Archived Items
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Paper and Pencil Test or Performance Task Group Assignments

Draft

A. Paper and Pencil Test persons

B. Performance Task Project persons

1. Write the paper and pencil test according to the guidelines.

 

2. Email as an attachment the paper and pencil test to critical friend or friends 2-3 weeks before due date.

 
 

3. Analyze paper and pencil tests according to the guidelines 1-2 weeks before the due date. Hand the critique to teacher and return it to the group member via email. This is a real critique. This critique should find concerns with the product, and make substantive recommendations for change.

4. Use the critiques to make changes to the paper and pencil test or write up how to overcome the critiques made.

 

5. Each member writes a reflection piece. The reflection pieces are handed in with the paper and pencil project.

 
 

6. Continue working on the Performance task

 

7. Hand the performance task via email attachment, as an attachment project to the other group—as assigned, and the teacher 2-3 weeks before it is due.

8. Analyze performance task according to the guidelines 1-2 weeks before the due date. Hand the critique to teacher and return it to the group member via email. This is a real critique. This critique should find concerns with the product, and make substantive recommendations for change.

 
 

9. Use the critiques to make changes to the performance task or write up how to overcome the critiques made.

 

10. Each member writes a reflection piece. The reflection pieces are handed in with the performance task.

   
Critiques are unique.  You are using your assessment skills to provide helpful feedback about the product, according to the requirements of the assignment. The critique can include details about punctuation, but you might decide to give more substantive feedback. Your critique should let me know, from what you say,  that you understand the scope of the assignment and how your peers have begun the process of fulfilling the requirements. When I read your critique, it should be written as if you are the evaluator.  Make recommendations. What do you like?  What would you change? You may not just say "this is good".  You must say why it is good. Your critique is worth 50 points.   Reflections are unique. You need to explain what you did on the project.  You need to answer the concerns and questions raised by the critiques.  You need to tell me what you learned.  You need to explain why you may not have answered a concern raised by the critique.  You need to tell me how you and your partner divided up the responsibilities of the assignment.  You are providing me with information about how you handled the groups process, and how you responded (as a professional) to the criticism.  Your reflection is part of the larger project.  It is part of the total 100 points. Each member in your team writes a separate reflection. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Go Back Home
 
© Copyright, Marcia Burrell-Ihlow
State University of New York College at Oswego