Reshaping World Politics
Chapter 1 Questions
- Describe a "real world" example of civil society in (a) your own
country and (b) some other country. In each of your examples, are the relevant
dynamics and processes of civil society contained within the borders of a
single state or do they transcend national boundaries? Explain your answer.
(9-10)
- What fundamental personal values do you employ to make sense of politics
and formulate political opinions? Where did you get (or how did you develop)
these values? How might your answers to these questions differ from those
given by someone who is another race or gender, lives in another country,
or subscribes to another religion? What does this tell you about the study
of world politics? (10-11)
- If civility is an important component of civil society (as Norton contends)
and if civil society can function in the absence of formal government institutions
(as Muslih suggests), what should be done with (sometimes) "uncivil"
actors such as religious fundamentalists or political extremists? Why? (12-13)
- Normative theorists argue that the term "normative theory" is
misleading, in that there is no such thing as "non-normative" theory.
Do you agree? Why or why not? (14)
- How does a people-centered understanding of international politics differ
from more conventional state-centered understandings? Toward which perspective
do you lean? Why? (15)
- What are some activities in which you've engaged that have changed you on
a personal level and helped you "gain political agency"? Explain
your answer. (17)
- With regard to "uncivil" actors, how relevant and viable are
Norton's "cast of mind" and Sylvester's "empathetic
cooperation"? What are some practical ways in which the adoption (or
application) of these concepts might influence the political dynamics of the
contemporary Middle East (i.e, Israel and the Palestinian territories)? How
likely is it that such ideas will gain a significant foothold in this or
other conflict-ridden political "hot spots"? Explain your
answer. (18)
- How would you characterize the relationship between global civil society
and the state system? Are the dynamics of global civil society and the state
system more complementary than contradictory or vice versa? Explain your answer
and provide supporting examples. (18-20)
- Is it a good thing or a bad thing that global civil society's channels of
opportunity are ideologically variable? Why? (19-20)
- Cite one NGO that works to bring about progressive change and one that works
toward conservative ends. What is your basis for assigning each NGO/TSMO to
its respective category? (21-22)
- Think of an NGO that you support, in practice or in principle, and use the
concept of "framing" to explain why you support it. (22)