Skip over primary navigation
General Faculty Assembly Minutes
General Faculty Assembly
February 6th, 2006

 

General Faculty Meeting Minutes                  February 6, 2006

Chair: Susan Camp                  Recorder: Jessica Godkin

 

 

The meeting was called to order at 4:01 PM.

 

I.            Approval of Agenda

The agenda was approved unanimously.

 

II.            Approval of Minutes of General Faculty Meeting of September 12, 2005

The minutes were approved unanimously.

 

III.            President's Report - Deborah Stanley

President Stanley gave updates on enrollment, the executive budget, legislative action, academic affaires initiatives, capital projects and the Inspiring Horizons campaign and then answered questions from the Assembly. 

 

IV.            UUP Report - Chuck Spector

C. Spector reported that last fall UUP met with Administration on adjunct and summer pay and performance programs for professionals.  At the Winter Delegate Assembly they passed the Constitutional Amendment on Retiree Chapter, the motion in favor of the Senate version of the Patriot Act Reauthorization Bill, and a resolution endorsing April 29, 2006 demonstration against the War in Iraq by USLAW. 

C. Spector is going to Albany to meet with the Legislators to discuss: the proposed $3.6 million increase in state funding for State Operated Campuses for next years' budget; UUP and SUNY are pushing for an additional $153.3 million in additional funding, which would include $25.5 million for full-time faculty and enrollment growth; UUP and SUNY want $50 million in capital funding for technology and academic equipment; UUP supports a $646,000 increase in EOP funding. 

C. Spector encouraged members to become more active in political action campaigns both locally and statewide.

 

V.            FA Senate- Luther Peterson            - (See attached)

 

VI.            Chair Report- S. Camp           

S. Camp announced that the Oswego State Task Force on Academic Administrative Officer Review convenes Friday, February 10.  Chancellor Ryan plans to talk with Presidents regarding 360 review of administrators.  Also, the Chair reported that she invited all committee chairs (Committee on Committee) to report to the Assembly throughout this semester, which will begin at the next Faculty Assembly meeting.

 

VII.             Unfinished Business

                        There was no unfinished business.              

 

VIII.            New Business

                        There was no new business.

 

The meeting was adjourned at 5:18 PM.

Winter Plenary Meeting

January 27-28, 2006

            Faculty Senate’s Winter Plenary, its 142nd plenary, took place at Farmingdale State University on Long Island Friday and Saturday a week ago.  As its president, Dr. Jonathan Gibralter, explained in his welcoming message to the senators, the college, which dates back to 1912, today enjoys the largest enrollment of SUNY’s technology colleges, with over 6000 students enrolled in twenty bachelor and ten associate degree granting programs.

            As is ccustomary, the plenary business began with a lengthy report by Faculty Senate President Carl Wiesalis.  Typically the report describes university-wide issues, FS activities since the previous plenary (in this case since late October 2005), and the focus of this plenary.  Most significant undoubtedly was the choice of John Ryan as SUNY Chancellor, and Wiesalis expressed pleasure not only for the result, but also for the process, in which three faculty members of the system, Joseph Hildreth (past FS president), Kimberley Reiser (president of the Faculty Council of Community Colleges), and Wiesalis, served on the fourteen member search committee.  Wiesalis–and Hildreth to me in private conversation–sees in this a welcome sign that the Board of Trustees (BOT) generally regards the faculty of the university more positively than has been the case in the past, despite the continued presence there of one trustee who continues without genuine foundation to berate us as leftist radicals bent on destroying our country.

            Turning to university budget concerns, Wiesalis noted that Chancellor Ryan is active in seeking to prevent the $500 tuition increase projected in the governor's budget proposal to the state legislature, to restore the many millions in the annual funding request of BOT a removed at the governor's office, and continues to push for the Rational Fiscal Policy endorsed by his predecessor, Robert King.  SUNY Central has launched a lobbying effort in the legislature that FS will augment with faculty input.

Academic Integrity and the so-called Academic Bill of Rights (ABoR): BOT’s Academic Standards Committee (ASC) and Central Administration are very much involved in issues of academic integrity and student plagiarism and cheating.  William Murabito of the SUNY Provost’s office is chair of a Provost’s Committee on Academic Integrity, and three Faculty Senators serve on it. Reflecting his experience at the Naval Academy, perhaps, the chancellor has even talked about honor codes.  Regarding the threat to our academic freedom posed by ABoR, the ASC will focus on the issue at its March 16 meeting.  Ominously, State Senator John De Francisco (SYRACUSE!) has introduced the bill in the legislature.  Murabito is preparing a refutation to present to ASC, and Faculty Senator Ken O’Brien of Brockport heads an FS ad hoc committee that has prepared materials and a statement opposing ABoR.  Additionally, UUP through its Academic Freedom Committee and the NYS Public Higher Education Conference Board will present statements against the bill.  Wiesalis, by the way, encourages constituents of Sen. De Francesco (and others as well) to work to enlighten him; Wiesalis noted that half of the senators who had originally signed on to De Francesco’s bill have removed their names.   

            Other announcements of the president:  (1) Central Administration continues to represent the Ceramics faculty in their problems with Alfred University administration; Wiesalis in encouraged by the outpouring of support by now almost every SUNY campus governance entity for the Ceramics faculty.  (As an aside, Faculty Senator Peer Bode of Ceramics has personally sent thanks for each and every campus’s resolution of support, and believes the support will make a difference.)  (2) There is a dispute across the street at Alfred State College between faculty and administration that has led FS to send a fact-finding Visitation Committee, whose final statement will be published shortly.  (3) Chancellor Ryan has appointed Dr. Kimberley Cline as CFO for the system.  (4) We are pushing a public relations initiative to showcase student achievement on SUNY campuses in the arts.  So far it has been focussed on art exhibitions at the Central Administration building in Albany.   Now Janet Nepkie, a music faculty member from Cortland, is co-chairing the committee and wants to bring in music and theater into the picture.  She is requesting that someone from each campus fine arts faculty volunteer to help her work on this.  (5) Wiesalis spoke enthusiastically about meetings with UUP leadership and the prospect of greater cooperation between the two organizations on issues of common interest, such as ABoR, tenure, lobbying, SUNY budget, and K-12 education.  (In the report of the executive committee report that followed Wiesalis’ report, there was mention of a joint UUP-FS advertising campaign to emphasize SUNY needs for more full time faculty.) 

            Faculty senators heard four presentations from guests in the course of the plenary.  The first, from Andrew Edwards and Marti Ellermann, SUNY legal counsels, dealt with current practices vis a vis the Sunshine Laws in NY State.  My impression from their presentation was that, excepting personnel kinds of decisions, most everything in public universities must take place in the open, and we need to keep record of balloting–who voted what!–in meetings such as those of our Faculty Assembly.

            The next presentation was from Assistant Provost Patty Francis, updating FS on the status of Strengthened Campus-Based Assessment and discussing the work of an Assessment Reporting Task Force.  Regarding assessment of the three areas involved, written communication, critical thinking, and mathematics, rubrics have been developed by faculty panels and for the first two nationally-normed tests approved, and campuses are now reporting their decisions as to which they will use.  For this GEAR has prepared “Tips” and these were distributed to campuses the past week.  GEAR will review all plans (57 in all)–”and hopefully approve” all of them–by the beginning of the Fall 2006 semester. Her presentation’s power point items are on the FS web, and I have a paper copy of it if anyone wishes to see it.

            Provost Salin’s presentation began with his announcement to us of his resignation and that he is looking forward to teaching at Stony Brook.  (1) His first topic was Mission Review II.   He made his final campus visit in mid December and is now developing MOUs in consultation with the campuses.  These new MOUs are broader in scope than for the previous MR I, dealing with facilities and finance matters as well as educational aims of the campuses, which is advantageous in advocating more aggressively for funding at state government.  His assessment of MR II progress is that it is going “very well.”  (2) Campuses are being pushed on retention and four-year graduation rates, which he believes to be a good idea.  (3) A SUNY document on procedures for mentoring and evaluating untenured faculty, which he has discussed in previous presentations to FS plenaries, is being accomplished.  (4) Again he brought up his concern for better integration of SUNY with K-12 instruction in the state.  He again said that he wants to talk with school district leadership around the state, saying that we are not entirely happy with the state of preparation of the students they send us, and learning from them what improvements they feel we need to make in teacher preparation.  In line with this, he announced the program in NYC whereby they would want to employ math and science graduates and at the same time start them in graduate programs to get their teacher certification.  (5) The “new and improved” BAP will go into effect for the next fiscal year.  Unlike the previous, it starts with an existing (i.e., realistic) funding, and for the first time includes funding for research initiatives.

Chancellor Ryan spoke with us twice, the first time along with the new CFO late afternoon on Friday, and secondly after dinner.  CFO Cline promised that BAP II will “hold harmless”–that is, no campus will be worse off in funding this year and money taken from comprehensive colleges (Oswego and its sisters) a couple years ago is being restored.  For the latter we need to get ten million more dollars to add to restoration already accomplished or in the works.  She also spoke to the funding needs to effect Ryan’s call for 300 new faculty.  She stated that increased library funding is a priority of the chancellor’s.

            Ryan spoke to issues raised by the sector reports, and thus in random fashion.  He spoke in support of reviews of administrators, now being implemented on many campuses, saying he does this and is pleased with the results.  EOP for once wasn’t reduced in the governor's budget this year, and he hopes to get it increased.  He congratulated the faculty for taking an active part in assessment.  We could have fought it, but that would have meant that the BOT would have done it on its own, which he does not want to see happen.  He wants full time faculty involved in all parts of the curriculum, including GenEd.  He responded favorably to the comprehensive college sector’s request for more support for our role in Graduate Education.  He spoke of a 5 year rolling plan for capital funding, which he believes will be instituted this year.  He expressed confidence that the dispute with Alfred University will be resolved satisfactorily for both sides.  He said that he supports the idea of faculty representation on BOT, and will write a letter in support of the motion before the legislature.  Finally, both in the afternoon and in his after dinner presentation Ryan spoke about the need for more funding for more faculty, among other things.  He stressed that the much reported request for $85 million is not correct and not enough; we really need $128.5 million in additional funding.

            Committee Reports and Resolutions:

1.              Awards Committee.  Presented a motion to request an increase in funding for Conversations in the Discipline programs to $50,000.  This was passed by FS without dissent.

2.            Governance Committee.  Presented a resolution regarding selection of interim presidents, endorsing a statement the committee prepared requesting greater consultation with local governance in the process of selecting interim presidents.  If a circumstance arises where time does not permit consultation, then an “officer in charge” be appointed initially, so that the consultation can take place.  Passed by FS without dissent.

3.             Graduate and Research Committee.  Is exploring a SUNY web site to describe all graduate and research programs throughout the SUNY system, with the thought that this could help recruit students to these programs.

4.            Operations Committee.  Perhaps the most discussed issue brought before FS at this plenary was the motion of this committee regarding increased funding for library acquisitions.  This was the third time FS has dealt with a motion from the committee on the matter, and again it was the consensus of the floor that the motion still needed reworking.  The motion this time focussed on a SUNY-wide cooperative collection development plan, the notion being that we should make decisions on new books, perhaps mainly in the (expensive) area of monographs, cooperatively.  However, the example given by the committee showed the dark side of this idea: the document presented noted that there are eight copies of Joe Ellis’s biography of George Washington in the system, and none of them have been checked out.  The committee intended to show that we should limit purchases and use acquisition moneys better.  Well, I rose to comment that this book, a new book, is a major biography of our first president, and that I am shocked that not every library has purchased it.  It belongs in every campus’s collection, and surely in short time will be checked out everywhere.  After I spoke a librarian in FS spoke in opposition to the motion, arguing that where cooperative expenditure should focus is in purchasing data bases used by all campuses, something that by the way I presented on behalf of our library staff at the previous plenary.  The motion was sent back to the committee for further work.

5.            Student Life Committee and Undergraduate Committee.  Most import from these committees was the announcement once again of the conference on March 23-24, “Academic Integrity: A New Look at Law, Policy and Practice.”  This will be in Albany, and all campuses are being requested to send one or two people to it.  The program is set, by the way, and I have a copy of the program.

Respectfully submitted,

Luther D. Peterson

Professor of History and Oswego Faculty Senator

 Last Updated: 7/9/07